× #1 The Constitution: Foundation of Modern Governance #2 fundamental rights #3 preamble #4 union territory #5 prime minister #6 Cabinet Ministers of India #7 Panchayati Raj System in India #8 44th Constitutional Amendment Act... #9 UNION TERRITORY #10 CITIZENSHIP #11 Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP) #12 Fundamental Duties #13 Union Executive #14 Federalism #15 Emergency Provisions #16 Parliament of India #17 Union Budget – Government Budgeting #18 State Executive. #19 State Legislature. #20 Indian Judiciary – Structure, Powers, and Independence #21 Tribunals #22 Local Government in India #23 Election #24 Constitutional Bodies #25 Statutory, Quasi-Judicial, and Non-Constitutional Bodies – The Backbone of Indian Governance #26 Regulatory Bodies in India #27 Pressure Group #28 Importance Supreme Court Judgements in India #29 Recent Bills Passed in Parliament #30 One Nation One Election proposal #31 Women’s Reservation Act 2023 #32 Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023 #33 Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 (IPC overhaul) #34 Electoral Bonds verdict 2024 #35 Same-Sex Marriage SC ruling 2023 #36 Uniform Civil Code (Uttarakhand) 2024 #37 GST Council vs States (Mohit Minerals 2022) #38 Internal Reservation for SC Sub-castes #39 Karnataka OBC Muslim quota litigation #40 Economic Weaker Sections (EWS) Review #41 Parliamentary Ethics Committee controversies 2024 #42 Speaker’s disqualification powers (10th Schedule) #43 Delimitation after 2026 freeze #44 Appointment of Election Commissioners Act 2023 #45 Judicial Accountability & Collegium transparency #46 Lokayukta & Lokpal performance audit #47 NJAC revival debate #48 Governor–State friction (TN, Kerala) #49 Tribal autonomy & Sixth Schedule expansion #50 Panchayat digital governance reforms #51 Urban Local Body finance post-15th FC #52 Police reforms and Model Police Act #53 Judicial infrastructure mission #54 National Education Policy (federal challenges) #55 Health federalism post-COVID #56 Gig-worker social security #57 Climate governance & Just Transition #58 India–Maldives tensions 2024 #59 India–Sri Lanka economic integration #60 India–Bhutan energy cooperation #61 India–Nepal border settlements #62 India–China LAC disengagement #63 India–US tech initiative (iCET) #64 Quad-Plus and Indo-Pacific law #65 BRICS expansion 2024 #66 UNSC reform negotiations #67 Global South after India’s G20 presidency #68 Israel–Hamas war & India #69 Afghanistan engagement #70 ASEAN–India trade upgrade #71 EU Carbon Border Mechanism #72 Arctic Policy & Svalbard Treaty #73 International Solar Alliance expansion #74 World Bank Evolution Roadmap #75 AI governance & global norms #76 Cybersecurity strategy 2024 #77 Deepfake regulation #78 Press freedom & defamation #79 RTI Act dilution concerns #80 Mission Karmayogi (Civil services reforms) #81 Citizen charters & Sevottam 2.0 #82 NITI Aayog SDG Localisation dashboards #83 NGT caseload & effectiveness #84 Judicial review of environmental clearances #85 Disaster Management Act post-cyclones #86 NCRB data transparency #87 Prison reforms & overcrowding #88 E-Courts Phase-III #89 Transgender Persons Act #90 Rights of Persons with Disabilities audit #91 Juvenile Justice Model Rules 2023 #92 Nutrition governance—Poshan Tracker #93 Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) export #94 FRBM review #95 Cooperative federalism—PM GatiShakti #96 Concurrent List disputes #97 Inter-State Council revival #98 River water disputes #99 Tribal rights vs forest conservation #100 Minority welfare schemes review #101 NGO roles & FCRA #102 Electoral roll & Aadhaar linkage #103 Model Code of Conduct digital enforcement #104 Parliamentary Committees backlog #105 State Legislative Council creation #106 Coastal zone governance (CRZ-II) #107 National Language Commission idea #108 Digital Commons & Open Source policy #109 Court-mandated mediation law #110 India’s refugee policy #111 Smart Cities Mission audit #112 Swachh Bharat Phase-II #113 One Health approach #114 National Research Foundation Bill #115 Internet shutdowns & proportionality #116 Caste census demand #117 Crypto-assets regulation draft #118 Public Sector Bank governance reforms #119 New Logistics Policy & ULIP #120 Labour Codes implementation #121 NaMo Drone Didi scheme #122 PM-JANMAN tribal mission #123 Vibrant Village Programme #124 Cyber-bullying legal framework #125 Plea bargaining expansion #126 UNHRC votes & India’s HR stance #127 Green Hydrogen Mission governance #128 Right to Digital Access (Fundamental Right) #129 Broadcasting Services Regulation Bill 2024 #130 National Commission for Minorities restructuring #131 Cooperative Federalism vs State Autonomy tensions #132 Governor’s Discretionary Powers—SC guidelines #133 Cybersecurity governance updates #134 Parliamentary Committee system reforms #135 AI governance framework #136 Inter-State Council effectiveness #137 Digital Public Infrastructure governance #138 Constitutional amendment procedure debates #139 Delimitation Commission & population freeze #140 Emergency provisions misuse concerns #141 Social media regulation & liability

indian polity

Introduction

For decades, India has lacked comprehensive caste data—except counts for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. The last full enumeration occurred under British rule in 1931. However, rising demands from opposition parties—especially the Congress—have compelled the government to agree to caste enumeration in the upcoming national census. While proponents view it as essential for equitable resource allocation and reservation policy, critics cite privacy risks, social divisiveness, and political opportunism. This blog unpacks the contemporary momentum, state precedents, legal contours, and policy challenges surrounding India's caste census.


Political Momentum & Government Decision

  • Long championed by Rahul Gandhi and the Congress, the caste census demand intensified over electoral cycles. Congress credited Gandhi’s persistence for compelling the government to finally relent. ([turn0search0]turn0search4]turn0search6])

  • On April 30, 2025, the Cabinet Committee on Political Affairs decided to include caste enumeration in the forthcoming census exercise. No implementation timeline has yet been announced. ([turn0search26])

  • Congress formally welcomed the decision, while urging clarity on budget allocation and execution schedule—and pressing for a full reversal of the 50% reservation ceiling, especially for OBCs. ([turn0search2]turn0search8]turn0search9])


State Survey Models as Precedents

Telangana SEEEP Survey (2024)

Launched in November 2024, covering nearly 97% of households, Telangana’s Social–Education–Employment–Economic Caste Survey (SEEEP) mapped caste along with socio-economic and employment data. Its findings showed BCs constituting 56.3% of the state’s population and influenced state-level reservation debates. ([turn0search25])

Bihar Caste Survey (2022–23)

Despite legal challenges, the Bihar government lawfully conducted its caste survey under the Collection of Statistics Act, 2008. In August 2023, the Patna High Court upheld its validity. The Supreme Court has not stayed its publication. It serves as a legal precedent for state‑level caste enumeration. ([turn0search24])

Andhra Pradesh Survey Proposal

Andhra Pradesh approved a state‑wide caste survey in late 2023. However, as of mid‑2025, results remain undisclosed—raising concerns over transparency and utility. ([turn0search28])


Arguments in Favor of National Caste Census

  • Foundation for Social Justice: Leaders like Rahul Gandhi argue that caste data is the basis for designing equitable reservation systems, especially expanding OBC quotas beyond the current 50% ceiling. (“Jitna pichada, utna madadh”) is the guiding principle. ([turn0search1]turn0search9])

  • Targeted Governance: Census data enables identification of under‑represented communities and informs targeted schemes, cash transfers, and educational or political quotas.

  • Modeling Success: Telangana and Bihar surveys showcase how granular caste data can guide policy—making those models templates for nationwide implementation. ([turn0search17])


Concerns & Counterarguments

Privacy & Constitutional Rights

Groups like the Nair Service Society have warned that caste enumeration risks violating Article 21 privacy rights and could deepen caste identities rather than diminish them. ([turn0news21])

Social Fragmentation Risks

Critics fear that caste enumeration may amplify division, incentivize vote‑bank politics, and reinforce caste identities—negating social integration advances. ([turn0news19]turn0news22])

Political Instrumentalization

Public commentary suggests the caste census may be exploited by parties (especially Congress) for electoral messaging rather than genuine reform. Reddit critiques highlight cynicism toward political motives overshadowing real social uplift. en.wikipedia.org+10indiatoday.in+10indianexpress.com+10indiatoday.in+5indianexpress.com+5The Times of India+5theweek.in+5en.wikipedia.org+5business-standard.com+5en.wikipedia.org+1The Times of India+1en.wikipedia.orgThe Times of IndiaThe Times of India

Legal Boundaries and Authority

Only the Central Govt can conduct a full census under the Census Act, 1948. State-level surveys may proceed under the Statistics Act but lack statutory force during delimitation or national policymaking. ([turn0search27]turn0search24])


Policy Implications & Forward Pathways

  • Reservation & Representation: Census data may justify expanding reservation caps or distributing quotas within OBC sub-categories—akin to Telangana’s internal categorization model. ([turn0news14])

  • Delimitation Impact: Caste count may influence delimitation exercises, political representation, and constituency mapping—raising sensitivity over its timing and transparency. ([turn0news23])

  • Quota Debate Escalation: In states like Tamil Nadu, where SC/ST and OBC quotas already exceed 60%, additional caste-based reservation demands may push the constitutional limit beyond 90%, potentially inviting legal crisis. ([turn0news23])


Recommendations for Implementing Caste Census Thoughtfully

  1. Set a Clear Timeline & Allocate Budget
    Government must officially announce census dates, field protocols, data safeguards, and budgetary provisions before enumerators begin work.

  2. Ensure Confidentiality & Data Security
    Census forms should anonymize personal identifiers beyond caste status. Legal safeguards must be established to prevent misuse or public disclosure of caste-linked identifiers.

  3. Limit Scope to Policy-Informing Use
    Caste data should be primarily used for welfare, reservations, and representation—not as a political scoreboard. Public communication should emphasize developmental, not divisive, objectives.

  4. Inclusive Survey Design & Oversight
    The design and conduct of the census should involve independent expert committees, with representation from minority communities, civil society, and legal scholars ensuring legitimate, transparent methodologies.

  5. Parallel Institutional Reform
    Simultaneous to caste enumeration, there should be reforms to anti‑caste laws, reservations in private institutions (under Article 15(5)), redistribution through CSR, and strong enforcement of anti‑discrimination norms.


Conclusion

A national caste census marks a historic policy pivot—potentially equipping India with data to unlock equitable governance and social justice. For the first time in nearly a century, caste-based demographic realities may be made visible at scale—powering better policy design for SCs, STs, OBCs, and minority groups.

Yet the exercise must be conducted responsibly—with fixed timelines, constitutional protections for privacy, clarity on fiscal and usage frameworks, and built-in safeguards against politicization. If executed with integrity, the caste census can move India toward targeted social transformation—otherwise, it risks becoming a census of division rather than justice.