Introduction
India’s ambitions to strengthen its R&D ecosystem led to a key recommendation in the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020: establish a central body to fund and coordinate research nationally. The Anusandhan National Research Foundation Bill, 2023, introduced in Parliament and enacted in August 2023, replaces the Science & Engineering Research Board (SERB), and proposes to mobilise ₹50,000 crore over five years to promote equitable, interdisciplinary research via public and private collaboration. Though lauded as transformative, the Bill has garnered both praise and concern from scientists, reform advocates, and civil society.
Institutional Architecture & Bill Provisions
Establishment & Legal Status
The Bill repeals the SERB Act (2008) and dissolves SERB, replacing it with the Anusandhan National Research Foundation (NRF)—a statutory high-level body to oversee research strategy across disciplines: natural sciences, engineering, environment, health, agriculture, and humanities.Reddit+15PRS Legislative Research+15The Economic Times+15RedditDrishti IAS+6India TV News+6The Hindu+6
Governance Structure
NRF is envisaged as an apex entity administered by the Department of Science and Technology. Its Governing Board, chaired by the Prime Minister (ex‑officio President) and supported by the Education and Science Ministers as ex‑officio Vice‑Presidents, includes eminent professionals across fields. A day-to-day Executive Council will be led by the Principal Scientific Adviser to the Government.NewsClick+8PM India+8Drishti IAS+8
Core Functions
NRF’s mandate includes:
-
Preparing R&D roadmaps and funding programmes,
-
Supporting research across universities and institutions,
-
Financing infrastructure and translational projects,
-
Encouraging international collaboration and private-sector investment,
-
Conducting annual surveys on research outcomes and spending.PRS Legislative ResearchReddit+2India TV News+2The Economic Times+2
Funding & Strategic Objectives
Financial Commitments
The Bill earmarks ₹50,000 crore for 2023–28. Government contributions amount to around ₹14,000 crore over five years, supplemented by ₹36,000 crore expected from the private sector—including CSR funding, philanthropy, and international collaborations.Wikipedia+15India Today+15The Hindu+15
Inclusive Research Vision
One key objective is to address uneven distribution of funding—between elite research hubs like IITs and state universities. NRF aims to institutionalise funding for colleges and institutions currently neglected under the existing system.The Economic Times+10Drishti IAS+10The Hindu+10
Bridging Siloed R&D Domains
By integrating disciplines—from social sciences to STEM—NRF proposes cross-disciplinary support in line with NEP’s vision to unify education and research.Drishti IASReddit
Support & Emerging Concerns
Optimism from Stakeholders
Proponents applaud NRF for its potential to democratise research funding, nurture talent across regions, and align research to national priorities rather than fragmented department-level agendas.Reddit+6NewsClick+6Down To Earth+6
Critiques from Civil Society
The All India Peoples’ Science Network (AIPSN) has expressed concerns about:
-
Centralisation of authority with the PM as NRF head,
-
Heavy reliance on unstructured private funding,
-
Risk of corporate influence dictating research trends,
-
Lack of detailed parliamentary scrutiny.NewsClick+1PM India+1Wikipedia+8PM India+8The Times of India+8
They advocate referral to a Parliamentary Standing Committee and inclusive consultation involving academics, state university councils, and international bodies.
Budgetary Clarity & Transparency Issues
Despite Cabinet approval in mid-2023 and allocation announcements, the Interim Union Budget for 2023–24 did not mention NRF. Actual allocation was sharply lower than projected—from ₹2,000 crore to just ₹258 crore. Scientists warn the low public outlay undermines NRF’s capacity to drive transformative change.NewsClickDown To Earth
Assessment: Opportunities & Implementation Barriers
| Opportunity | Risk or Barrier |
|---|---|
| National-level vision with multi-disciplinary reach | Centralised control limiting academic autonomy |
| Access for under-resourced institutions | Reliance on unspecified private funding sources |
| Formal mechanism for university research | Funding shortfall vs. needs of existing R&D bodies |
| Potential linkages across ministries | Lack of transparency on governance and role clarity |
Recommendations for Effective Launch
-
Ensure Balanced Governance & Academic Autonomy
NRF should have independent researcher representation and rotating membership beyond ex‑officio officials to safeguard academic independence. -
Clarify & Commit Public Funding Streams
A legally binding roadmap for public allocation (e.g., ₹2,800 crore/year from budget) is essential to build trust and sustainability. -
Mandate Stakeholder Consultation & Oversight
NRF must engage academics, state higher‑education councils, and civil society in funding priorities and programme design. -
Promote Regional & Institutional Equity
Funding criteria should prioritise research centres beyond IITs and IISc, focusing on inclusive growth aligned with NEP’s distributive vision. -
Periodic Transparency & Impact Tracking
Annual public reporting of grants, outputs, international collaborations, infrastructure development, and usage of One Nation One Subscription resources will build accountability.Reddit+1Reddit+1NewsClick+1The Hindu+1PM India+1The Times of India+1RedditReddit -
Support Complementary Measures Like One Nation One Subscription
Integration with initiatives like ONOS (providing access to thousands of journals) will enhance access and output from weaker research institutions.Reddit
Conclusion
The Anusandhan National Research Foundation Act, 2023 represents a landmark reform in India’s research ecosystem. Envisioned as an apex body to coordinate, fund, and democratise research aligned with NEP 2020, NRF could potentially transform funding flows, expand research participation across geographic and institutional divides, and foster interdisciplinary innovation.
Yet its success hinges on balanced governance, transparent financing, academic autonomy, and consistent oversight mechanisms. Concerns over centralised control, insufficient public financing, and unclear structural details must be addressed to ensure NRF shifts from rhetoric to impact. With proper design and policy direction, India can institutionalise a peer‑reviewed, equitable R&D system and take meaningful strides toward becoming a global innovation leader.