Introduction
The Indo-Pacific has emerged as the epicenter of 21st-century geopolitics. With rising economic powers, vital maritime trade routes, and evolving security challenges, the region demands a collaborative and law-abiding approach to maintain peace and prosperity. Enter the Quad-Plus alliance and the evolving realm of Indo-Pacific law—two key elements reshaping regional order. While the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (Quad)—comprising the United States, India, Japan, and Australia—focuses on strategic and defense cooperation, the Quad-Plus brings in additional regional partners to broaden its scope. At the same time, Indo-Pacific law is becoming increasingly important to regulate maritime rights, freedom of navigation, and international legal frameworks in the region. Together, these elements represent a shift toward a more rules-based, multilateral order.
Understanding the Quad and the Evolution of Quad-Plus
The Quad was originally conceived in 2007 as an informal security dialogue among four major democracies: India, the United States, Japan, and Australia. Its initial focus was on maritime cooperation and responding to natural disasters, such as the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami. However, due to geopolitical shifts and the rise of China’s assertiveness in the South China Sea, the Quad was revived in 2017 with a more strategic agenda.
As the dialogue matured, the Quad began addressing maritime security, cyber threats, critical technologies, climate change, and vaccine diplomacy, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, to extend its influence and engage more stakeholders, the idea of a "Quad-Plus" framework emerged.
Quad-Plus refers to the informal expansion of the Quad's cooperation to include countries like South Korea, Vietnam, New Zealand, France, and the United Kingdom. The objective is to make the Quad more inclusive, enhance its legitimacy, and align it with a broader Indo-Pacific strategy that respects sovereignty, freedom of navigation, and international law.
What is Indo-Pacific Law?
Indo-Pacific Law is not a codified legal framework, but rather an evolving set of principles, agreements, maritime laws, and regional norms that guide the behavior of states within the Indo-Pacific. It is deeply rooted in existing international laws such as the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), but goes further by emphasizing the rule of law, freedom of navigation, peaceful resolution of disputes, and adherence to multilateral agreements.
Some key areas covered under Indo-Pacific Law include:
-
Maritime Boundaries and Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs)
-
Freedom of Navigation and Overflight
-
Security Cooperation and Anti-Piracy Measures
-
Environmental and Fisheries Law
-
Cybersecurity and Data Sovereignty
-
Trade and Investment Dispute Resolutions
Why Quad-Plus Matters in the Indo-Pacific Legal Landscape
The expansion of the Quad into the Quad-Plus format reflects a growing consensus that regional security and economic development must be governed by a rules-based order. As China continues to assert territorial claims in the South China Sea, many countries feel the need for legal backing and collective action.
Here’s how the Quad-Plus supports the evolution of Indo-Pacific Law:
1. Promoting Rule of Law and UNCLOS Compliance
Quad-Plus nations consistently advocate for freedom of navigation, opposing unilateral attempts to alter maritime boundaries. This stance reinforces UNCLOS as the foundational legal document governing the region’s oceans.
2. Coordinating Legal and Policy Frameworks
Whether it’s cybersecurity laws, digital trade regulations, or defense logistics agreements, Quad-Plus countries often engage in joint exercises, legal harmonization, and intelligence sharing, ensuring that their national laws are aligned with regional standards.
3. Dispute Resolution and Peaceful Negotiation
Quad-Plus partners push for diplomatic dialogue over military conflict, encouraging countries involved in territorial disputes to seek arbitration or international court rulings—as seen in the Philippines’ case against China in 2016 under UNCLOS.
4. Enabling Collective Action in Crises
The legal ability to conduct joint humanitarian missions, disaster response, and maritime patrols depends heavily on bilateral and multilateral agreements. Quad-Plus supports the legal frameworks that enable these collaborative efforts.
Challenges in Implementing Indo-Pacific Law
Despite the positive intentions, there are considerable obstacles:
-
Lack of Binding Regional Treaties: Unlike the European Union or NATO, the Indo-Pacific lacks a comprehensive legal treaty that binds members together.
-
Differing Legal Systems: Countries within Quad-Plus operate under vastly different legal traditions—common law, civil law, or hybrid systems—making alignment complex.
-
Chinese Opposition: China's rejection of the 2016 UNCLOS ruling in favor of the Philippines sets a concerning precedent for legal enforcement in the region.
-
Ambiguity and Soft Law: Much of Indo-Pacific law operates on "soft law" mechanisms such as joint declarations, which are not legally binding.
The Role of Regional Organizations and Institutions
While the Quad-Plus is an important pillar, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), Indian Ocean Rim Association (IORA), and Pacific Islands Forum (PIF) also contribute to shaping Indo-Pacific law. They offer platforms for:
-
Regional legal cooperation
-
Dialogue on norms and rules
-
Environmental agreements
-
Counter-terrorism frameworks
Collaboration between Quad-Plus and these bodies enhances legitimacy and inclusiveness, making legal standards more acceptable across diverse political systems.
Conclusion: Toward a Secure and Lawful Indo-Pacific Future
The Indo-Pacific region is poised at a crucial crossroads. As economic and military interests expand, so do the challenges of governance, maritime security, and legal accountability. The Quad-Plus framework, while not a formal alliance, plays a vital strategic role in building legal capacity, harmonizing laws, and strengthening rule-based order.
By promoting shared values—democracy, transparency, sovereignty, and legal equality—Quad-Plus becomes more than just a geopolitical tool; it becomes a platform for legal diplomacy. The development of Indo-Pacific law through mechanisms like UNCLOS, regional cooperation treaties, and cyber regulations ensures that the region does not descend into unilateralism or legal chaos.
Going forward, deeper legal integration, mutual recognition of maritime rights, and the establishment of formal multilateral treaties could elevate the Quad-Plus from a dialogue forum to a robust legal and strategic coalition. In an era where power is often projected through grey-zone tactics and legal manipulation, the Indo-Pacific needs law as much as it needs deterrence.
A balanced mix of hard security and legal clarity, driven by platforms like Quad-Plus, can secure the Indo-Pacific not just against external threats but also against the erosion of international legal norms. A future rooted in law is not just desirable—it is essential.